Mexico
What are some of the technical, political, financial or regulatory challenges to corporations adopting green energy in the short/medium term in your country and how have these challenges been overcome (or how can they be overcome)?
The main problem is that the current administration is not in favour of private participation in the energy industry and would like to have the State-owned CFE controlling the market. There have not been any changes in the laws, yet, but the is new policy has created uncertainty. However, the market since the reform of 2013 has evolved to an open market structure with solid regulations, and it is unlikely that this new government could change the rules to give back to CFE an integrated monopoly.
For instance, most of the Self-Supply projects are renewables. The regulations allow that these projects have a cost benefit in the transmission and distribution of electricity. The new government has indicated that these benefits are currently under review and may be terminated. However, there are legal mechanisms available to fight against such measures.
Mexico
Are there any anticipated regulatory changes which will alter the regulatory landscape for corporate green energy and corporate PPAs?
As mentioned in Challenges, the government has announced the review of the transmission and distribution rates currently available for renewable Self-Supply projects. These special rates are similar to a subsidy, to allow the development of renewable generation. Other that the termination of these special rates, there are no other anticipated regulatory changes.
Mexico
What is the corporate appetite for green energy, including any political or financial incentives available to corporates to adopt green energy?
Mexico has adopted aggressive international commitments to develop the use of green energy. The regulations provide that all consumers have to obtain a certain percentage of their electricity through renewable sources. This percentage is currently 7.4%, but in 2021, it will be increased to 10.9%, and in 2022 such percentage will be 13.9%. Increments for the following years will be announced by the Energy Ministry. The main responsible parties are the suppliers, who need to purchase the electricity from a portfolio of renewable generators in such a way, that their customers consume electricity from renewable sources to comply with these percentages. If such consumption minimum requirements are not met, the responsible party would need to purchase green energy certificates (by its Spanish acronym “CELs”) in the Mexican market.
What are the key local advantages of the corporate PPA model which can benefit our clients?
Under the Self-Supply scheme, the most beneficial aspect is price. Renewable developers have been able to offer significant discounted prices to the standard CFE end user price.
For projects post the 2013 energy reform, where the Self-Supply scheme is no longer available, large consumers are still looking, first to comply with the clean energy minimum consumption requirements; second, to obtain lower prices from renewable sources; third, to use in their advertisement that they are a “clean energy user”. Finally, but not less important, companies are looking for reliability in the supply.
What subsidies are applicable to the generation and sale of renewable energy?
There are no subsidies in Mexico for renewable generation or sale of electricity. As mentioned above, there are some advantages given to Self-Supply projects in the transmission of electricity from renewable sources.
Does your country implement a national support scheme with tradable green certificates (such as guarantees of origins)?
The clean energy certificates (CELs) are issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE) in Mexico to renewable facilities.
Mexico
To the extent corporate PPAs are deployed, how are prices, terms and risks affected?
Topic | Details |
Do prices tend to be floating or fixed? | Most PPAs, particularly the Self-Supply projects, are based on a percentage discount over the CFE standard rate. |
What term is typically agreed for the PPAs? | Most PPAs are between 15 to 20 years. However, in recent years we have seen from 2 to 5 years. |
Are the PPAs take-or-pay or limited volume? | Take-or-pay. |
Are there any other typical risks? | Perhaps the only serious risk is a possible change in law that would increase the transmission rate, which would make the Self-Supply projects economically non-feasible. |
To the extent corporate PPAs are deployed, in whose favour will the risks typically be balanced?
Type of risk | Details |
Volume risk | There is no volume risk. Consumers maintain their supply contract with the CFE utility. If the renewable supply is short, the supply from the CFE utility kicks in, at the CFE standard rates. |
Change in law | Equally balanced |
Increase / reduction of benefits | Equally balanced |
Market liberalisation (if applicable) | Equally balanced |
Credit risk | The generator assumes the credit risk. |
Imbalance power risk | Equally balanced |
Production profile risk | Equally balanced |
Mexico
Does your country operate a balancing responsibility scheme?
Balancing is the responsibility of the system operator “CENACE”, a governmental institution regulated by the Energy Regulatory Commission (CRE).
If your country operates a balancing responsibility scheme, who is the balancing authority and do the generator and offtaker typically undertake balancing themselves?
CENACE is not an authority, it is just the operator. The authority is the CRE. The generator and offtaker do not take balancing themselves.
Mexico
What significant transactions/deals have taken place in the last 12-18 months?
There have been many, but there is no public record or reliable source of information.
What transactions/deals are anticipated to come to market in the next 12-18 months?
Hard to say, there is no public record or reliable source of information.