Angola
Luís Filipe Carvalho
Partner
DLA Piper Africa, Angola (ADCA)
[email protected]
T +244 926 612 525
View bio
Australia
Onno Bakker
Partner
DLA Piper Australia
[email protected]
T +61 2 9286 8260
View bio
Alyson Eather
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +61 407 248 748
View bio
Belgium
Ilse Van de Mierop
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +32 (0) 2 500 1576
View bio
Brazil
Roberto Barros
Partner
Campos Mello Advogados
[email protected]
T +55 11 3077 3513
View bio
Canada
Marc Philibert
Partner
DLA Piper (Canada) LLP
[email protected]
T +1 514 392 8442
View bio
Chile
Mauricio Halpern
Partner
DLA Piper Chile
[email protected]
T +56-2 2798 2611
View bio
Colombia
Camilo Martínez
Partner
DLA Piper Martinez Beltran
[email protected]
T +57 1 317 4720
View bio
Czech Republic
Miroslav Dubovský
Country Managing Partner
DLA Piper Prague LLP
[email protected]
T +420 222 817 500
View bio
Leo Javorek
Counsel
DLA Piper Prague LLP
[email protected]
T +420 222 817 622
View bio
Finland
Hans Sundblad
Partner
DLA Piper Finland Attorneys Ltd
[email protected]
T +358 9 4176 0421
View bio
France
Erwan Lacheteau
Partner
DLA Piper
[email protected]
T +33 6 86 48 82 81
View bio
Germany
Wolfram Distler
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +49 69 271 33 022
View bio
Ghana
Kizzita Mensah
Partner
Reindorf Chambers
[email protected]
T +233 302 225 674
View bio
Hungary
Péter Györfi-Tóth
Partner
Horváth & Partners Law Firm
[email protected]
T +36 1 510 1120
View bio
Ireland
Conor Houlihan
Partner
DLA Piper Ireland
[email protected]
T +353 1 4365465
View bio
Italy
Luciano Morello
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +39 338 690 73 96
View bio
Ivory Coast
Mame Ngoné Sow
Senior Associate
DLA Piper Africa, Senegal (GENI & KEBE)
[email protected]
T +221 33 821 19 16
View bio
Japan
Kaoru Umino
Partner
DLA Piper Tokyo Partnership Gaikokuho Kyodojigyo Horitsu Jimusho
[email protected]
T +81 3 4550 2813
View bio
Luxembourg
Xavier Guzman
Partner
DLA Piper Luxembourg
[email protected]
T +352 26 29 04 2052
View bio
Mauritius
Shalinee Dreepaul Halkhoree
Partner
Juristconsult Chambers
[email protected]
T +230 465 0020
View bio
Mexico
Edgar Romo
Partner
DLA Piper Gallastegui y Lozano
[email protected]
T +52 55 5261 1858
View bio
Morocco
Fabrice Armand
Partner
DLA Piper Casablanca s.a.r.l.
[email protected]
T +212 520 427 856
View bio
Netherlands
Gerrard Kneppers
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +31 (0) 6 20 390 673
View bio
New Zealand
Michael Thompson
Partner
DLA Piper New Zealand
[email protected]
T +64 9 300 3866
View bio
Norway
Egil Hatling
Partner
Advokatfirma DLA Piper Norway DA
[email protected]
T +47 24 13 15 00
View bio
Peru
Ricardo Escobar
Partner
DLA Piper Peru
[email protected]
T +1 511 616 1200
View bio
Poland
Mariusz Hyla
Partner
DLA Piper Giziński Kycia sp.k.
[email protected]
T +48 22 540 78 22
View bio
Portugal
Nuno Neves
Partner
DLA Piper ABBC
[email protected]
T +21 358 36 27
View bio
Puerto Rico
Nikos Buxeda
Managing Partner
DLA Piper (Puerto Rico) LLC
[email protected]
T +1 787 945 9114
View bio
Romania
Ioan Chiper
Counsel
DLA Piper Dinu SCA
[email protected]
T +40372155875
Senegal
Mame Ngoné Sow
Senior Associate
DLA Piper Africa, Senegal (GENI & KEBE)
[email protected]
T +221 33 821 19 16
View bio
Singapore
Vincent Seah
Partner
DLA Piper Singapore Pte. Ltd.
[email protected]
T +65 6512 9595
View bio
Slovak Republic
Péter Györfi-Tóth
Partner
Horváth & Partners Law Firm
[email protected]
T +36 1 510 1120
View bio
South Africa
Jackie Pennington
Partner
DLA Piper South Africa Services (Pty) Ltd
[email protected]
T +27 (0)11 302 0824
View bio
Spain
César Herrero
Partner
DLA Piper Spain S.L.U.
[email protected]
T +34 91 790 1656
View bio
Jesús Zapata
Partner
DLA Piper Spain S.L.U.
[email protected]
T +34 91 788 7373
View bio
Juan Gelabert
Partner
DLA Piper
[email protected]
T +34 91 790 1687
View bio
Natalia López Condado
Counsel
DLA Piper
[email protected]
T +34 672107449
View bio
Sweden
Henrik Sjorslev
Partner
DLA Piper Denmark Law Firm P/S
[email protected]
T +45 33 34 03 04
View bio
Thailand
Waranon Vanichprapa
Partner, Country Managing Partner
[email protected]
T +66 2 686 8555
View bio
UK - England and Wales
Sarah Day
Partner
DLA Piper UK LLP
[email protected]
T +44 (0)113 369 2104
View bio
UK - Scotland
Sarah Day
Partner
DLA Piper UK LLP
[email protected]
T +44 (0)113 369 2104
View bio
United Arab Emirates
James Iremonger
Partner
DLA Piper LLP
[email protected]
T +971 4 438 6253
View bio
United States
John T. Cusack
Partner
DLA Piper LLP (US)
[email protected]
T +1 312 368 4049
View bio
Are there any restrictions on lending and borrowing?
The development of professional lending activity may only be carried out by financial institutions authorized by the BNA.
Foreign investors who develop their projects by using benefits under the Private Investment Law may have recourse to credit in Angolan banks (under the Angolan applicable legislation).
What are common lending structures?
The common lending structures are Financial Banking institutions.
What are the differences between lending to institutional / professional or other borrowers?
The law does not mention special differences between lending to institutional and non-institutional debtors.
The only legal regime that is exclusive to individuals is the consumer credit regime.
Do the laws recognize the principles of agency and trusts?
No.
Are there any other notable risks or issues around lending?
No.
Are there any other notable risks or issues around borrowing?
No.
Are there any restrictions on giving and taking guarantees and security?
A company can grant a security interest aiming to secure its obligations as a borrower on a credit facility and as a guarantor of the obligations of other borrowers and guarantors’ obligations under a credit facility.
For that reason, the general rule set forth under Angolan legal framework is that a company’s corporate power is restricted to rights and duties considered adequate in order to proceed with the exercise of the company’s corporate object.
Hence, it is assumed that the granting of guarantees regarding other entities’ duties is opposed to the purpose of companies, except in situations where the companies’ own interest is legitimate in providing the guarantee or the company being considered is in a group or control relationship with other companies (Article 6(3) Angolan Companies Law).
The company’s own legitimate interest is visible when providing the downstream guarantees. However, it is less visible when providing upstream and cross-stream guarantees, being advisable for the necessary resolutions to be given with the intention to justify the own interest of the company, which in certain circumstances might be an indirect one, when providing the guarantee.
In regard to governmental or other consents or filings (or other formalities) required when granting/taking a guarantee, with exception of when there are state-owned and other public sector companies, the general rule is that no governmental consent or filings is required under the law, in order for a guarantee being provided by an Angolan company to be enforceable.
Notwithstanding, a guarantee provided by an Angolan company becomes enforceable when either a shareholder or border consent is given in accordance with the Angolan Companies Law. Commonly, such consent will detail expressly the benefit expected to be acquired from the provision of the guarantee.
Moreover, a security can be taken over inventory when executing a written agreement. Whenever there is a situation of non-payment or the occurrence of other circumstances presumed to be described in the pledge agreement, the pledgee or security agent can provide an enforcement notice to the pledgor. As an alternative, parties may prefer the provision of ordinary notices containing details of the stock.
Additionally, a company cannot guarantee and/or give a security to support borrowing arising from the financing of direct or indirect acquisition of shares of the company, being expressly forbidden (Article 344 of the Angolan Companies Law). Exceptions are available. Criminal liability of the directors/managers of such company may be considered when violating this prohibition, as well as the declaration of voidance and nullity of the agreement, guarantee or security interest.
Contrary to that, no express prohibition exists when the subject is the direct or indirect financing of shares of any company which directly or indirectly owns shares in the company or shares in a sister subsidiary, even though it is generally understood as applicable. Again, as previously mentioned, the corporate powers of the company may be restricted in respect of granting of guarantees or security.
What are common types of guarantees and security?
The Angolan Civil Code in Book II, Chapter VI, establishes the following types of secure lending obligations:
I. Provision of Bonds;
II. Bail;
III. Consignation of income;
IV. Pledge;
V. Mortgage, and
VI. Right of Retention.
Angolan law establishes that the possibility to provide general security over the assets of a given entity through a general security agreement is treated as null and void since there is a lack of determination of the specific assets subject to the security.
Thus, a security agreement must identify the assets that are subject to the security created by the agreement. It must have a certain criterion that as a result gives the possibility to identify the secured assets at a given time.
As mortgages and consignation of income must be granted by public deed, whereas pledged may be granted by the celebration of private agreements, the adoption of one single agreement or separate agreements varies in accordance with the type of security being granted.
Moreover, in companies incorporated in Angola, security can be taken over shares by pledges of shares (quotas or shares).
The shares on a Joint Stock limited liability companies (Sociedades Anónimas) are carried out through means of registration in the securities holder's account, with an indication of the number of shares pledged, the guaranteed obligation and identification of the beneficiary. If the voting right is granted to the pledge creditor, the pledge may be constituted by registration in their account. In the other hand, on Private limited liability companies (Sociedades por Quotas), the pledge must be done through means of a public deed.
The said pledges of shares may be either in book-entry form or in a certified form. The procedure to be followed varies according to the type of company in question, since such security can be granted by a document governed by the laws of other jurisdiction (e.g. English law) upon the compliance of the formalities set out by Angolan Law.
Are there any other notable risks or issues around giving and taking guarantees and security?
In circumstances where only a small benefit to the guaranteeing/securing company can be shown, it is likely that there is no legitimate interest to the company in providing the guarantee/security.
Consequently, unless the company is part of a group or it is in a control relationship with the entity whose obligations it guarantees/secures, the granting of the guarantee/security may be declared null and void.
The Civil Procedure Code, article 1175, determines that the declaration of bankruptcy may be filed within two years of the occurrence of the facts established by law, even if the trader has ceased trading or died.